Tuesday, December 17, 2013
Christine Lagarde -La guardiana de la economía mundial
La primera directora gerente del Fondo Monetario Internacional (FMI) se ha convertido en una pionera en todos los centros de poder mundial. Curtida como abogada de negocios en EE UU, exministra de Economía de Francia, carismática, esquiva e implacable, cara a cara se muestra menos diva de lo que cabe esperar. "El FMI ha sido el chivo expiatorio en algunos países" durante la crisis, afirma a lo largo de esta conversación en París, en la que también desvela su lado más personal. Entrevistar a Christine Lagarde, directora gerente del Fondo Monetario Internacional (FMI), exige preparativos propios de un jefe de Estado y una condicionalidad que, salvando las distancias, parece inspirada en los rescates de la temida troika FMI, Banco Central Europeo y Comisión Europea. Después de un mes de tira y afloja con el gabinete de prensa en Washington, la cita queda supeditada a algunas premisas. Enviar un cuestionario en inglés, una biografía y una foto del periodista, y no hacer preguntas sobre dos asuntos: la política francesa y el 'caso Bernard Tapie', el escándalo en el que Lagarde se vio implicada en 2007, cuando era ministra de Economía y el Estado abonó 403 millones de euros al empresario. Tras una nueva negociación, más breve, el gabinete aceptará un par de preguntas sobre ambas cosas. En la entrevista, Lagarde se limitará a esquivarlas con evasivas.
Sunday, December 15, 2013
Toni Morrison & Junot Díaz
"I think the most sustained love of mine," Díaz has said, "the one that's carried me through all these years, is my relationship with Toni Morrison. I'm telling you, I'm one of those people who's still cracking my head on many of the ideas Toni Morrison both suggested and elaborated on in her work." Witness a powerful event as Díaz comes face to face with his literary hero to celebrate her remarkable career.
Toni Morrison is the Robert F. Goheen Professor in the Humanities, Emerita at Princeton University. Her ten major novels, The Bluest Eye, Sula, Song of Solomon, Tar Baby, Beloved, Jazz, Paradise, Love, A Mercy and Home have received extensive critical acclaim. She received the National Book Critics Award in 1978 for Song of Solomon and the 1988 Pulitzer Prize for Beloved. Both novels were chosen as the main selections for the Book of the Month Club in 1977 and 1987 respectively. In 2006 Beloved was chosen by the New York Times Book Review as the best work of American fiction published in the last quarter-century. In 1993 Ms. Morrison was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature.Toni Morrison is a Trustee of the New York Public Library, a member of the American Academy and Institute of Arts and Letters and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. She is a member of the American Philosophical Society, the North American Network of Cities of Asylum, and the Author's Guild where she served on the Guild Council and as Foundation Treasurer. She served on the NEA National Council of the Arts for six years.Junot Díaz's first book, the short story collection Drown, established him as a writer with "the dispassionate eye of a journalist and the tongue of a poet" (Newsweek). His first novel, The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao, established him as a bestseller and earned critical acclaim; Wao was named #1 Fiction Book of the Year" by Time magazine and spent more than 100 weeks on the New York Times bestseller list. In his new book, This Is How You Lose Her, Díaz again offers a collection of short stories, all deeply concerned with love -- obsessive love, illicit love, fading love, maternal love. Diaz is a 2012 MacArthur Fellow and Pulitzer Prize-winner.Junot Díaz was born in the Dominican Republic and raised in New Jersey. He is the recipient of the Eugene McDermott Award, a fellowship from the Guggenheim Foundation, and a Lila Acheson Wallace Reader's Digest Award. He is the fiction editor at the Boston Review and on the Board of the Pulitzer Prize, and is the Rudge and Nancy Allen Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He lives in New York City.
Toni Morrison is the Robert F. Goheen Professor in the Humanities, Emerita at Princeton University. Her ten major novels, The Bluest Eye, Sula, Song of Solomon, Tar Baby, Beloved, Jazz, Paradise, Love, A Mercy and Home have received extensive critical acclaim. She received the National Book Critics Award in 1978 for Song of Solomon and the 1988 Pulitzer Prize for Beloved. Both novels were chosen as the main selections for the Book of the Month Club in 1977 and 1987 respectively. In 2006 Beloved was chosen by the New York Times Book Review as the best work of American fiction published in the last quarter-century. In 1993 Ms. Morrison was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature.Toni Morrison is a Trustee of the New York Public Library, a member of the American Academy and Institute of Arts and Letters and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. She is a member of the American Philosophical Society, the North American Network of Cities of Asylum, and the Author's Guild where she served on the Guild Council and as Foundation Treasurer. She served on the NEA National Council of the Arts for six years.Junot Díaz's first book, the short story collection Drown, established him as a writer with "the dispassionate eye of a journalist and the tongue of a poet" (Newsweek). His first novel, The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao, established him as a bestseller and earned critical acclaim; Wao was named #1 Fiction Book of the Year" by Time magazine and spent more than 100 weeks on the New York Times bestseller list. In his new book, This Is How You Lose Her, Díaz again offers a collection of short stories, all deeply concerned with love -- obsessive love, illicit love, fading love, maternal love. Diaz is a 2012 MacArthur Fellow and Pulitzer Prize-winner.Junot Díaz was born in the Dominican Republic and raised in New Jersey. He is the recipient of the Eugene McDermott Award, a fellowship from the Guggenheim Foundation, and a Lila Acheson Wallace Reader's Digest Award. He is the fiction editor at the Boston Review and on the Board of the Pulitzer Prize, and is the Rudge and Nancy Allen Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He lives in New York City.
Arundhati Roy
Smiley & West
Arundhati Roy, author of the new text, "Capitalism: A Ghost Story", has an update from the front lines of the world's biggest democracy, India. Plus, TransAfrica founder Randall Robinson reflects on his friendship with Nelson Mandela, and a listener from Virginia has a Biblical response to West's comments on same-sex marriage.
Arundhati Roy, author of the new text, "Capitalism: A Ghost Story", has an update from the front lines of the world's biggest democracy, India. Plus, TransAfrica founder Randall Robinson reflects on his friendship with Nelson Mandela, and a listener from Virginia has a Biblical response to West's comments on same-sex marriage.
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
La Gente Que Me Gusta - Mario Benedetti
Me gusta la gente que vibra, que no hay que empujarla, que no hay que decirle que haga las cosas, sino que sabe lo que hay que hacer y lo hace.
Me gusta la gente que cultiva sus sueños hasta que esos sueños se apoderan de su propia realidad. Me gusta la gente con capacidad para asumir las consecuencias de sus acciones. La gente que arriesga lo cierto por lo incierto para ir detrás de un sueño, quien se permite huir de los consejos sensatos dejando las soluciones en manos de nuestro padre Dios.
Me gusta la gente que es justa con su gente y consigo misma. La gente que agradece el nuevo día, las cosas buenas que existen en su vida, que vive cada hora con buen ánimo dando lo mejor de sí, agradecido de estar vivo, de poder regalar sonrisas, de ofrecer sus manos y ayudar generosamente sin esperar nada a cambio.
Me gusta la gente capaz de criticarme constructivamente y de frente, pero sin lastimarme ni herirme. La gente que tiene tacto. Me gusta la gente que posee sentido de la justicia. A ESTOS LLAMO MIS AMIGOS.
Me gusta la gente que sabe la importancia de la alegría y la predica. La gente que mediante bromas nos enseña a concebir la vida con humor. La gente que nunca deja de ser aniñada. Me gusta la gente que con su energía, contagia. Me gusta la gente sincera y franca, capaz de oponerse con argumentos razonables a las decisiones de cualquiera.
Me gusta la gente fiel y persistente, que no desfallece cuando de alcanzar objetivos e ideas se trata. Me gusta la gente de criterio, la que no se avergüenza en reconocer que se equivocó o que no sabe algo. La gente que, al aceptar sus errores, se esfuerza genuinamente por no volver a cometerlos.
Me gusta la gente que lucha contra adversidades. Me gusta la gente que busca soluciones. Me gusta la gente que piensa y medita internamente. La gente que valora a sus semejantes no por un estereotipo social ni cómo lucen. La gente que no juzga ni deja que otros juzguen.
Me gusta la gente que tiene personalidad. Me gusta la gente capaz de entender que el mayor error del ser humano, es intentar sacarse de la cabeza aquello que no sale del corazón.
La sensibilidad, el coraje, la solidaridad, la bondad, el respeto, la tranquilidad, los valores, la alegría, la humildad, la fe, la felicidad, el tacto, la confianza, la esperanza, el agradecimiento, la sabiduría, los sueños, el arrepentimiento y el amor para los demás y propio, son cosas fundamentales para llamarse GENTE.
Con gente como esa, me comprometo para lo que sea por el resto de mi vida, ya que por tenerlos junto a mí, me doy por bien retribuido.
Me gusta la gente que es justa con su gente y consigo misma. La gente que agradece el nuevo día, las cosas buenas que existen en su vida, que vive cada hora con buen ánimo dando lo mejor de sí, agradecido de estar vivo, de poder regalar sonrisas, de ofrecer sus manos y ayudar generosamente sin esperar nada a cambio.
Me gusta la gente capaz de criticarme constructivamente y de frente, pero sin lastimarme ni herirme. La gente que tiene tacto. Me gusta la gente que posee sentido de la justicia. A ESTOS LLAMO MIS AMIGOS.
Me gusta la gente que sabe la importancia de la alegría y la predica. La gente que mediante bromas nos enseña a concebir la vida con humor. La gente que nunca deja de ser aniñada. Me gusta la gente que con su energía, contagia. Me gusta la gente sincera y franca, capaz de oponerse con argumentos razonables a las decisiones de cualquiera.
Me gusta la gente fiel y persistente, que no desfallece cuando de alcanzar objetivos e ideas se trata. Me gusta la gente de criterio, la que no se avergüenza en reconocer que se equivocó o que no sabe algo. La gente que, al aceptar sus errores, se esfuerza genuinamente por no volver a cometerlos.
Me gusta la gente que lucha contra adversidades. Me gusta la gente que busca soluciones. Me gusta la gente que piensa y medita internamente. La gente que valora a sus semejantes no por un estereotipo social ni cómo lucen. La gente que no juzga ni deja que otros juzguen.
Me gusta la gente que tiene personalidad. Me gusta la gente capaz de entender que el mayor error del ser humano, es intentar sacarse de la cabeza aquello que no sale del corazón.
La sensibilidad, el coraje, la solidaridad, la bondad, el respeto, la tranquilidad, los valores, la alegría, la humildad, la fe, la felicidad, el tacto, la confianza, la esperanza, el agradecimiento, la sabiduría, los sueños, el arrepentimiento y el amor para los demás y propio, son cosas fundamentales para llamarse GENTE.
Con gente como esa, me comprometo para lo que sea por el resto de mi vida, ya que por tenerlos junto a mí, me doy por bien retribuido.
Monday, December 9, 2013
Friday, November 22, 2013
Naomi Klein: How science is telling us all to revolt
Global capitalism has made the depletion of resources so rapid, convenient and barrier-free that “earth-human systems” are becoming dangerously unstable in response.
There was one dynamic in the model, however, that offered some hope. Brad Werner -a geophysicist from the University of California, San Diego- termed it “resistance” – movements of “people or groups of people” who “adopt a certain set of dynamics that does not fit within the capitalist culture”. According to the abstract for his presentation, this includes “environmental direct action, resistance taken from outside the dominant culture, as in protests, blockades and sabotage by indigenous peoples, workers, anarchists and other activist groups”.
There was one dynamic in the model, however, that offered some hope. Brad Werner -a geophysicist from the University of California, San Diego- termed it “resistance” – movements of “people or groups of people” who “adopt a certain set of dynamics that does not fit within the capitalist culture”. According to the abstract for his presentation, this includes “environmental direct action, resistance taken from outside the dominant culture, as in protests, blockades and sabotage by indigenous peoples, workers, anarchists and other activist groups”.
Thursday, November 21, 2013
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Sunday, November 17, 2013
Friday, November 15, 2013
Thinking as the activity of operating with signs
The nature of thinking
We wrongly interpret thinking as a medium.
This is a puzzlement caused by the mystifying use of our language.
This kind of mistake recurs again and again in philosophy.
We are tempted to think that things are hidden.
Yet nothing of the sort is the case.
It is not new facts about time which we want to know.
All the facts that concern us lie open before us. (p. 6)
Yet nothing of the sort is the case.
It is not new facts about time which we want to know.
All the facts that concern us lie open before us. (p. 6)
"It is misleading then to talk of thinking as a 'mental activity'.
We may say that thinking is essentially the activity of operating with signs.
This activity is performed by the hand, when we think by writing;
This activity is performed by the hand, when we think by writing;
by the mouth and larynx, when we think by speaking; and if we think by
imagining signs or pictures, I can give you no agent that thinks. If then
you say that in such cases the mind thinks, I would only draw your attention
to the fact that you are using a metaphor, that here the mind is an agent
in a different sense from that in which the hand can be said to be the agent
of writing". (p. 6-7)
"If again we talk about the locality where thinking takes place we have right to
say that this locality is the paper on which we write or the mouth which speaks.
And if we talk of the head or the brain as the locality of thought, this is using
the expression "locality of thinking" in a different sense." (p.7)
"We think with our mouth" or "we think with a pencil on a piece of paper". (p. 7)
"Perhaps the main reason why are we so strongly inclined to talk of the head as the
locality of our thoughts is this: the existence of the words "thinking" and "thoughts"
alongside of the words denoting (bodily) activities, such as writing, speaking, etc…."
"… thinking essentially consists in operating with signs." (p. 15)
It is misleading "if we say 'thinking is a mental activity' (p. 16),
Thinking is an activity of the hand. The mind does not think. The hand is the agent in
writing. The locality where thinking take place, the paper or the mouth. Wrongly we talk
of the head or the brain as the locality of thought. We think with our mouth (p. 43)
We think with a pencil or a piece of paper. Thinking is a bodily activity: writing, speaking
is something not nothing.
The word = its use
The idea of our visual field being located in our brain arouse from a grammatical
misunderstanding (p.9)
Thinking, hoping, wishing, believing not independent of thought, hope, wish (p. 41)
Thinking is not a private experience.
"Make the following experiment: say and mean a sentence, e.g.: "it will probably rain
tomorrow". Now think the same thought again, mean what you just meant, but without
saying anything (either aloud or to yourself). If thinking that it will rain tomorrow
accompanied saying that it will rain tomorrow, then just do the first activity and leave
out the second. -If thinking and speaking stood in the relation of the words and the melody
of a song, we could leave out the speaking and do the thinking as we can sing the tune
without the words." (p. 42)
It is imposible to think without saying anything.
Ludwig Wittgenstein. The Blue and Brown Books.
Harper & Row. New York. 1965 (based on the second edition published in 1960)
Ludwig Wittgenstein. The Blue and Brown Books.
Harper & Row. New York. 1965 (based on the second edition published in 1960)
Friday, November 1, 2013
Monday, October 28, 2013
Sunday, October 27, 2013
Saturday, October 26, 2013
Thursday, October 24, 2013
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Monday, October 21, 2013
The Fifth Estate - Julian Assange
Labels:
Julian Assange,
new york times,
The Fifth Estate
Thursday, October 17, 2013
Thursday, October 10, 2013
Wednesday, October 9, 2013
Tuesday, October 8, 2013
Thursday, September 19, 2013
Two Years After Occupy Wall Street
Two years after the Occupy Wall Street movement shifted the conversation on economic inequality, Democracy Now looks at its origins in New York City’s Zuccotti Park and its continued legacy in a number of different groups active today.
DN speaks with Nicole Carty, actions coordinator with The Other 98 Percent, and a facilitator of general assemblies and spokescouncil meetings during Occupy, where she was a member of the Occupy People of Color Caucus. Also joining DN is Nathan Schneider, editor of the website Waging Nonviolence, and a longtime chronicler of the Occupy movement for Harper’s Magazine, The Nation, The New York Times, and The Catholic Worker. Scheider’s new book, "Thank You Anarchy: Notes from the Occupy Apocalypse," chronicles Occupy’s first year.
Manhattan retained the dubious distinction of having the biggest income gap of any big county in the US. The mean income of the lowest fifth was $9,635, compared with $389,007 for the top fifth and $779,969 for the top 5 percent -more than an eightyfold difference between bottom and top. The New York Times
DN speaks with Nicole Carty, actions coordinator with The Other 98 Percent, and a facilitator of general assemblies and spokescouncil meetings during Occupy, where she was a member of the Occupy People of Color Caucus. Also joining DN is Nathan Schneider, editor of the website Waging Nonviolence, and a longtime chronicler of the Occupy movement for Harper’s Magazine, The Nation, The New York Times, and The Catholic Worker. Scheider’s new book, "Thank You Anarchy: Notes from the Occupy Apocalypse," chronicles Occupy’s first year.
Manhattan retained the dubious distinction of having the biggest income gap of any big county in the US. The mean income of the lowest fifth was $9,635, compared with $389,007 for the top fifth and $779,969 for the top 5 percent -more than an eightyfold difference between bottom and top. The New York Times
Wednesday, September 18, 2013
Naomi Klein - A global Green Marshall Plan
With her newest, yet-to-be named book, Naomi Klein turns her attention to climate change.
Naomi Klein's books and articles have sought to articulate a counternarrative to the march of corporate globalization and government austerity. She believes climate change provides a new chance for creating such a counternarrative. "The book I am writing is arguing that our responses to climate change can rebuild the public sphere, can strengthen our communities, can have work with dignity."
Klein came to the idea that climate change could be a kind of a "people's shock," an answer to the shock doctrine – not just another opportunity by the disaster capitalists to feed off of misery, but an opportunity for progressive forces to deepen democracy and really improve livelihoods around the world.
No Logo: how brand names manipulate public desires while exploiting the people who make their products.
The Shock Doctrine or how free-marketeers often use crises – natural or manufactured – to ram through deregulatory policies.
Naomi Klein's books and articles have sought to articulate a counternarrative to the march of corporate globalization and government austerity. She believes climate change provides a new chance for creating such a counternarrative. "The book I am writing is arguing that our responses to climate change can rebuild the public sphere, can strengthen our communities, can have work with dignity."
Klein came to the idea that climate change could be a kind of a "people's shock," an answer to the shock doctrine – not just another opportunity by the disaster capitalists to feed off of misery, but an opportunity for progressive forces to deepen democracy and really improve livelihoods around the world.
No Logo: how brand names manipulate public desires while exploiting the people who make their products.
The Shock Doctrine or how free-marketeers often use crises – natural or manufactured – to ram through deregulatory policies.
Monday, September 16, 2013
Sunday, August 11, 2013
Friday, August 2, 2013
Mario Mendoza. Ser artista es aprender a percibir de otro modo
El miedo al otro nos está llevando a conflictos con nosotros mismos
El ‘hikikomori’ es el registro extremo de ese miedo: chicos que pueden llevar diez años sin salir de su habitación, viviendo con los horarios invertidos. Ellos revelan una tendencia que nos arrastra a todos. Japón tiene la tasa de comercio sexual más baja del mundo porque la gente casi no se toca. Poseen tecnologías sofisticadas de realidad virtual para satisfacer su deseo sin necesidad de estar con alguien. Ellos nos demuestran que estamos en el umbral de una nueva época. Nuestro deseo esta siendo metamorfoseado. Preferimos satisfacernos a nosotros mismos que entrar en el contacto con el otro. Es menos peligroso.
El ‘hikikomori’ es el registro extremo de ese miedo: chicos que pueden llevar diez años sin salir de su habitación, viviendo con los horarios invertidos. Ellos revelan una tendencia que nos arrastra a todos. Japón tiene la tasa de comercio sexual más baja del mundo porque la gente casi no se toca. Poseen tecnologías sofisticadas de realidad virtual para satisfacer su deseo sin necesidad de estar con alguien. Ellos nos demuestran que estamos en el umbral de una nueva época. Nuestro deseo esta siendo metamorfoseado. Preferimos satisfacernos a nosotros mismos que entrar en el contacto con el otro. Es menos peligroso.
Saturday, July 27, 2013
Monday, July 22, 2013
Cornel West on Obama’s Response to Trayvon Martin
Cornel West response to President Obama’s comments on the acquittal of George Zimmerman and racism in the United States.
On Obama’s remarks comparing himself to Trayvon Martin, Cornel West says: "Will that identification hide and conceal the fact there’s a criminal justice system in place that has nearly destroyed two generations of precious, poor black and brown brothers? Obama hasn’t said a word until now — five years in office and can’t say a word about a 'new Jim Crow.' … Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder — will they come through at the federal level for Trayvon Martin?
On Obama’s remarks comparing himself to Trayvon Martin, Cornel West says: "Will that identification hide and conceal the fact there’s a criminal justice system in place that has nearly destroyed two generations of precious, poor black and brown brothers? Obama hasn’t said a word until now — five years in office and can’t say a word about a 'new Jim Crow.' … Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder — will they come through at the federal level for Trayvon Martin?
Labels:
Cornel West,
Democracy Now,
On Obama's plantation
Saturday, July 13, 2013
Friday, June 21, 2013
The Struggle Against Dogmatism: Wittgenstein and the Concept of Philosophy
Oskari Kuusela - Marie McGinn
One of the most perplexing, and to some irritating, aspects of Wittgenstein's later philosophy is his apparent insistence that he is not putting forward philosophical theses, or making any claim with which others could possibly disagree or which it is possible to dispute. It can be hard to see how this can be understood as anything other than an attempt by Wittgenstein to privilege his own conceptions of meaning or of psychological phenomena, or as a claim to the absolute and indisputable correctness of his observations on rules, understanding, sensations, the propositions of mathematics, and so on. The idea that Wittgenstein's later philosophy is in some way implicitly dogmatic has been encouraged by interpretations, such as the one developed in great detail by Peter Hacker and Gordon Baker in their commentary on the Philosophical Investigations, which hold that Wittgenstein does not put forward theses insofar as he is merely describing the rules for the use of expressions; his remarks are held to be indisputable insofar as anyone who understands the relevant expressions must agree to Wittgenstein's descriptions, and recognize that any deviation from them inevitably results in nonsense. On this conception of it, the kind of conceptual investigation that Wittgenstein is engaged in results in the articulation of the grammatical rules implicit in our use of expressions, and provides a base from which unanswerable criticisms of the use that philosophers make of the expressions of our language can be mounted. Wittgenstein's idea that his aim is to make philosophical problems 'completely disappear' is, on this interpretation, taken to be equivalent to an intention to show that they one and all depend upon a demonstrably deviant, and therefore nonsensical, employment of words.
One of the most perplexing, and to some irritating, aspects of Wittgenstein's later philosophy is his apparent insistence that he is not putting forward philosophical theses, or making any claim with which others could possibly disagree or which it is possible to dispute. It can be hard to see how this can be understood as anything other than an attempt by Wittgenstein to privilege his own conceptions of meaning or of psychological phenomena, or as a claim to the absolute and indisputable correctness of his observations on rules, understanding, sensations, the propositions of mathematics, and so on. The idea that Wittgenstein's later philosophy is in some way implicitly dogmatic has been encouraged by interpretations, such as the one developed in great detail by Peter Hacker and Gordon Baker in their commentary on the Philosophical Investigations, which hold that Wittgenstein does not put forward theses insofar as he is merely describing the rules for the use of expressions; his remarks are held to be indisputable insofar as anyone who understands the relevant expressions must agree to Wittgenstein's descriptions, and recognize that any deviation from them inevitably results in nonsense. On this conception of it, the kind of conceptual investigation that Wittgenstein is engaged in results in the articulation of the grammatical rules implicit in our use of expressions, and provides a base from which unanswerable criticisms of the use that philosophers make of the expressions of our language can be mounted. Wittgenstein's idea that his aim is to make philosophical problems 'completely disappear' is, on this interpretation, taken to be equivalent to an intention to show that they one and all depend upon a demonstrably deviant, and therefore nonsensical, employment of words.
Thursday, June 20, 2013
El Poema Más Bello del Mundo
Noam Chomsky on the Heroism of Bradley Manning
The linguistics professor, activist, and public intellectual on secret trade deals, killing polio workers, fighting for the commons in Turkey and terrorism
What do Takism Square, Google Glass, the Trans-Pacific Partnership and NSA data gathering have in common?
Chomsky always provides perspective, even when one is pretty well informed about the topics he addresses. The Magna Carta was about protecting The Commons. It was the origin of habeas corpus, - something the world's indigenous people are trying to teach us about.
What do Takism Square, Google Glass, the Trans-Pacific Partnership and NSA data gathering have in common?
Chomsky always provides perspective, even when one is pretty well informed about the topics he addresses. The Magna Carta was about protecting The Commons. It was the origin of habeas corpus, - something the world's indigenous people are trying to teach us about.
Monday, June 17, 2013
Sunday, June 16, 2013
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)