Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
Monday, April 29, 2013
Daniele Ganser -Important 9/11 Investigation
Daniele Ganser is one of those people who seriously question the official story of 9/11. Daniele is a Swiss historian and professor of modern history at the University of Basel. In 2001 he received his PhD from the University of Basel and is currently the president of the Swiss branch of the Association for theStudy of Peak Oil and Gas. He has been rigorously studying the topic of 9/11 and working hard to determine what truly happened that morning, as well as who caused it to happen. His conclusions do not align with the official 9/11 commission report nor do they align with the theory of Islamic terrorists committing the act.
This is a video lecture he performed in 2012 where he describes his fascinating findings about 9/11 and reveals his stance on the matter. This is a powerful lecture and I highly recommend checking it out if you are seriously looking to learn more about the topic of 9/11.
A 12 year and incredibly costly war, both financially and in terms human lives, has come as a result of the 9/11 attacks which began the idea of pre-emptive wars. The US now has better control over oil, other commodities in the areas invaded and a tighter security squeeze on their citizens. While argued, it seems more than obvious that the idea of terrorism is now a piece politicians use to pass what would otherwise be un-passable acts and bills. It is also a term thrown around heavily by mass media that immediately draws attention, builds fear and gains the support of people for almost anything. But is it possible that Islamic terrorism is not a serious threat regardless of what governments and mass media has said? Many seem to think so and it isn’t just the “crazy conspiracy theorists” as the media and government like to call them. People from all walks of life, levels of education and social status’ have been questioning 9/11 since the day it happened. They have reason to, the story simply does not add up.
This is a video lecture he performed in 2012 where he describes his fascinating findings about 9/11 and reveals his stance on the matter. This is a powerful lecture and I highly recommend checking it out if you are seriously looking to learn more about the topic of 9/11.
A 12 year and incredibly costly war, both financially and in terms human lives, has come as a result of the 9/11 attacks which began the idea of pre-emptive wars. The US now has better control over oil, other commodities in the areas invaded and a tighter security squeeze on their citizens. While argued, it seems more than obvious that the idea of terrorism is now a piece politicians use to pass what would otherwise be un-passable acts and bills. It is also a term thrown around heavily by mass media that immediately draws attention, builds fear and gains the support of people for almost anything. But is it possible that Islamic terrorism is not a serious threat regardless of what governments and mass media has said? Many seem to think so and it isn’t just the “crazy conspiracy theorists” as the media and government like to call them. People from all walks of life, levels of education and social status’ have been questioning 9/11 since the day it happened. They have reason to, the story simply does not add up.
Saturday, April 27, 2013
Thursday, April 25, 2013
Jeremy Scahill on "Dirty Wars" and Obama’s Expanding Drone Attacks
The World Is a Battlefield (video)
In Obama administration a lot of people are being led to believe that there is such a thing as a clean war.
Scahill discusses secret operations in Africa, the targeting of U.S. citizens in Yemen and the key role WikiLeaks played in researching the book. He also reveals imprisoned whistleblower Bradley Manning once tipped him off to a story about the private security company Blackwater.
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Paul Krugman -Crisis economica
En esta era de la información, los errores matemáticos pueden llevar al desastre. La Mars Orbiter de la NASA se estrelló porque los ingenieros olvidaron hacer la conversión a unidades del sistema métrico; el plan de la ballena de Londres de JPMorgan Chase salió mal en parte porque quienes hicieron los modelos dividieron por una suma en lugar de por una media. De modo que, ¿fue un error de codificación de Excel lo que destruyó las economías del mundo occidental? Esta es la historia hasta la fecha: a principios de 2010, dos economistas de Harvard, Carmen Reinhart y Kenneth Rogoff, divulgaron un artículo, Growth in a time of debt (Crecimiento en una época de endeudamiento), que pretendía identificar un umbral crítico, un punto de inflexión, para la deuda pública. Una vez que la deuda supera el 90% del producto interior bruto, afirmaban, el crecimiento económico cae en picado.
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
Monday, April 15, 2013
The great legacy of Wittgenstein’s philosophy is his new vision and method
The method of philosophy is the method of grammatical clarification – that is, the description of the logico-linguistic structures of language for the purpose of dissolving philosophical problems.
Wittgenstein transformed the philosophy of logic, of language, and of philosophy of mind.
But after the mid-1970s his influence waned. The kinds of work and methods he advocated in philosophy of language were displaced by the effort to produce a so-called ‘theory of meaning for a natural language’. Similarly, his methods and preoccupations in philosophy of mind were displaced by the new pseudo-discipline that goes by the misleading name of ‘cognitive science’ – misleading, since it is neither scientific nor cognitive. His general conception of philosophy as an elucidatory activity that contributes to human understanding rather than adding to human knowledge was set aside by philosophers who embraced a cognitive conception of philosophy allied with the natural sciences.
Wittgenstein’s new vision and method is a transition from the quest for truth to the quest for sense or understanding.
Philosophy is characterized by its problems, which are not empirical, scientific problems. They cannot be answered by experiments, and they do not call for new discoveries. They often appear to be questions about the nature of things. But, Wittgenstein argued, they are typically questions in search of a sense, stemming from certain kinds of unclarity – conceptual unclarity. And they are to be resolved, or often dissolved, by conceptual clarification.
Clarity is to be achieved, primarily (but not only) by a careful description of the uses of words.
Wittgenstein transformed the philosophy of logic, of language, and of philosophy of mind.
But after the mid-1970s his influence waned. The kinds of work and methods he advocated in philosophy of language were displaced by the effort to produce a so-called ‘theory of meaning for a natural language’. Similarly, his methods and preoccupations in philosophy of mind were displaced by the new pseudo-discipline that goes by the misleading name of ‘cognitive science’ – misleading, since it is neither scientific nor cognitive. His general conception of philosophy as an elucidatory activity that contributes to human understanding rather than adding to human knowledge was set aside by philosophers who embraced a cognitive conception of philosophy allied with the natural sciences.
Wittgenstein’s new vision and method is a transition from the quest for truth to the quest for sense or understanding.
Philosophy is characterized by its problems, which are not empirical, scientific problems. They cannot be answered by experiments, and they do not call for new discoveries. They often appear to be questions about the nature of things. But, Wittgenstein argued, they are typically questions in search of a sense, stemming from certain kinds of unclarity – conceptual unclarity. And they are to be resolved, or often dissolved, by conceptual clarification.
Clarity is to be achieved, primarily (but not only) by a careful description of the uses of words.
Judith Butler -Resignification as subversive repetition
Power works in part through discourse and it works in part to produce and
destabilise subjects.
The notion of performativity, and performative speech acts in particular
-understood as those speech acts that bring into being that which they name. This is
the moment in which discourse becomes productive in a fairly specific way. So what I'm
trying to do is think about the performativity as that aspect of discourse that has the
capacity to produce what it names. Then I take a further step, through the Derridean
rewriting of Austin, and suggest that this production actually always happens through a
certain kind of repetition and recitation.
To make the problematic of reproduction central to the sexing of the body?
I am not sure that is, or ought to be, what is absolutely salient or primary in the sexing
of the body. If it is, I think it's the imposition of a norm, not a neutral description of biological
constraints.
I do not deny certain kinds of biological differences. But I always ask under what
conditions, under what discursive and institutional conditions, do certain biological
differences become the salient characteristics of sex.
The heterosexual matrix [in Gender Trouble] became a kind of totalising symbolic, and
that's why I changed the term in Bodies That Matter to heterosexual hegemony. This
opens the possibility that this is a matrix which is open to rearticulation, which has a
kind of malleability. So I don't actually use the term heterosexual matrix in Bodies That
Matter.
There's a very specific notion of gender involved in compulsory heterosexuality: a
certain view of gender coherence whereby what a person feels, how a person acts, and
how a person expresses herself sexually is the articulation and consummation of a
gender. It's a particular causality and identity that gets established as gender coherence
which is linked to compulsory heterosexuality. It's not any gender, or all gender, it's that
specific kind of coherent gender.
The politics of queer theory, the ideas of subversive repetition and
transgressive reinscription
Sunday, April 14, 2013
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
Peter Hacker on Ludwig Wittgenstein (articles)
http://info.sjc.ox.ac.uk/scr/hacker/docs/TheDevelopmentOfWittgensteinsPhilosophyOfPsychology.pdf
http://info.sjc.ox.ac.uk/scr/hacker/docs/Philosophy%20for%20RIP.pdf
http://info.sjc.ox.ac.uk/scr/hacker/docs/Relevance%20of%20W's%20phil.%20of%20psychol.%20to%20science.pdf
http://info.sjc.ox.ac.uk/scr/hacker/docs/Emotions%20-%20conceptual%20framework.pdf (Damasio's theory of emotions)
Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
Daniel Alarcon -Election night in Peru’s largest prison
Lurigancho held nearly a quarter of Peru’s inmates, and overcrowding had reached a crisis point. The prison, originally built for a couple thousand men, had become home to more than 11,000. Shanks were sold openly, as were crack pipes, ingeniously fashioned from bent scraps of metal. Thin, bare-chested men slumped against the walls, covered in scars, wearing the downcast, narrow gaze of drug addicts. Tuberculosis was rampant. Lurigancho was producing some thirty tons of trash a week, much of it uncollected, while the poorest inmates fed themselves by sifting through this refuse for anything edible. A gray scarf hung from an old radio tower, the prison’s unofficial flag — a memento of a drug-addled inmate who’d escaped from the psychiatric clinic, climbed the tower, and hanged himself. So severe was the crowding that a few hundred homeless squatters had taken over an abandoned building to create an informal twenty-first housing block. In most prisons, if inmates had access to hammers, concrete, bricks, shovels, spades, and the like, one imagines they’d use them to escape. Instead, when I visited Block Twenty-One, I found the residents hard at work, building a wall around their new home so they could have a safe place to walk .
http://www.revistaanfibia.com/cronica/lurigancho-el-gobierno-de-los-presos
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)