Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
Monday, April 29, 2013
Daniele Ganser -Important 9/11 Investigation
Daniele Ganser is one of those people who seriously question the official story of 9/11. Daniele is a Swiss historian and professor of modern history at the University of Basel. In 2001 he received his PhD from the University of Basel and is currently the president of the Swiss branch of the Association for theStudy of Peak Oil and Gas. He has been rigorously studying the topic of 9/11 and working hard to determine what truly happened that morning, as well as who caused it to happen. His conclusions do not align with the official 9/11 commission report nor do they align with the theory of Islamic terrorists committing the act.
This is a video lecture he performed in 2012 where he describes his fascinating findings about 9/11 and reveals his stance on the matter. This is a powerful lecture and I highly recommend checking it out if you are seriously looking to learn more about the topic of 9/11.
A 12 year and incredibly costly war, both financially and in terms human lives, has come as a result of the 9/11 attacks which began the idea of pre-emptive wars. The US now has better control over oil, other commodities in the areas invaded and a tighter security squeeze on their citizens. While argued, it seems more than obvious that the idea of terrorism is now a piece politicians use to pass what would otherwise be un-passable acts and bills. It is also a term thrown around heavily by mass media that immediately draws attention, builds fear and gains the support of people for almost anything. But is it possible that Islamic terrorism is not a serious threat regardless of what governments and mass media has said? Many seem to think so and it isn’t just the “crazy conspiracy theorists” as the media and government like to call them. People from all walks of life, levels of education and social status’ have been questioning 9/11 since the day it happened. They have reason to, the story simply does not add up.
This is a video lecture he performed in 2012 where he describes his fascinating findings about 9/11 and reveals his stance on the matter. This is a powerful lecture and I highly recommend checking it out if you are seriously looking to learn more about the topic of 9/11.
A 12 year and incredibly costly war, both financially and in terms human lives, has come as a result of the 9/11 attacks which began the idea of pre-emptive wars. The US now has better control over oil, other commodities in the areas invaded and a tighter security squeeze on their citizens. While argued, it seems more than obvious that the idea of terrorism is now a piece politicians use to pass what would otherwise be un-passable acts and bills. It is also a term thrown around heavily by mass media that immediately draws attention, builds fear and gains the support of people for almost anything. But is it possible that Islamic terrorism is not a serious threat regardless of what governments and mass media has said? Many seem to think so and it isn’t just the “crazy conspiracy theorists” as the media and government like to call them. People from all walks of life, levels of education and social status’ have been questioning 9/11 since the day it happened. They have reason to, the story simply does not add up.
Saturday, April 27, 2013
Thursday, April 25, 2013
Jeremy Scahill on "Dirty Wars" and Obama’s Expanding Drone Attacks
The World Is a Battlefield (video)
In Obama administration a lot of people are being led to believe that there is such a thing as a clean war.
Scahill discusses secret operations in Africa, the targeting of U.S. citizens in Yemen and the key role WikiLeaks played in researching the book. He also reveals imprisoned whistleblower Bradley Manning once tipped him off to a story about the private security company Blackwater.
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Paul Krugman -Crisis economica
En esta era de la información, los errores matemáticos pueden llevar al desastre. La Mars Orbiter de la NASA se estrelló porque los ingenieros olvidaron hacer la conversión a unidades del sistema métrico; el plan de la ballena de Londres de JPMorgan Chase salió mal en parte porque quienes hicieron los modelos dividieron por una suma en lugar de por una media. De modo que, ¿fue un error de codificación de Excel lo que destruyó las economías del mundo occidental? Esta es la historia hasta la fecha: a principios de 2010, dos economistas de Harvard, Carmen Reinhart y Kenneth Rogoff, divulgaron un artículo, Growth in a time of debt (Crecimiento en una época de endeudamiento), que pretendía identificar un umbral crítico, un punto de inflexión, para la deuda pública. Una vez que la deuda supera el 90% del producto interior bruto, afirmaban, el crecimiento económico cae en picado.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)